From 1607282ce2e9ecae953807b64e0f9c524eceb19d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: M66B Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2015 07:13:18 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Uodated FAQ Refs #29 --- README.md | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 477c3360..a0ad9196 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -104,7 +104,8 @@ and adding a lot of complex code to do network translation from OSI layer 3 to l This is how most (all?) other no root firewalls work. NetGuard is unique, because it doesn't implement a TCP/IP stack and is therefore both highly efficient and simple. -For more advanced use cases while not sacrificing battery usage, rooting and using a iptables based firewall, +For more advanced use cases, while not sacrificing battery usage, +rooting your device and using a iptables based firewall, like [AFWall+](https://github.com/ukanth/afwall) might be a better option. @@ -112,6 +113,12 @@ like [AFWall+](https://github.com/ukanth/afwall) might be a better option. No, it even can't, because NetGuard has no *internet* permission. + +**(7) Why are applications without internet access shown?** + +Internet permission can be granted with each application update without user consent. +Not filtering applications without internet access allows you to block internet access before such an update occurs. + Support -------