mirror of
https://git.code.sf.net/p/archivemail/code
synced 2024-12-22 07:42:55 +00:00
Updated TODO, dropping a lot of obsolete items
Notable items that are now resolved or implemented: * archives are now locked * the mbox classes have been refactored to a cleaner design * we moved from flock locking to fcntl * the setuid() feature is long gone * symlink attacks for tempfiles are not possible (that is really an ancient TODO item from the original author) * the test suite now has a lot of maildir test cases
This commit is contained in:
parent
368f312e2d
commit
af3bb16a4c
2 changed files with 0 additions and 23 deletions
21
TODO
21
TODO
|
@ -11,21 +11,10 @@ LOCKING & Co:
|
|||
sane way, see Debian bug #349068. mbox_sync_mailbox() in the mutt code might
|
||||
be an example how to write back a changed mailbox.
|
||||
* Double-check the entire locking code.
|
||||
* FIXME: no locking at all is applied to the archives.
|
||||
|
||||
Seems like existing archives are not read or validated in any way. New archive
|
||||
data is blindly appended... Probably okay, but should be documented.
|
||||
|
||||
I don't like the representation of mboxes as python objects, it's unclean.
|
||||
E.g. the archive mbox object is a subclass of mailbox.UnixMailbox, but this
|
||||
super class is not used in any way, it's not even initialized. Makes sense,
|
||||
since we need write-only access, and UnixMailbox is read-only. But should it be
|
||||
a subclass at all, then?
|
||||
.
|
||||
Also, the original mbox and the "retain mbox" are separate objects. This is
|
||||
disputable. E.g. the finalise() method of the retain mbox overwrites the
|
||||
existing original mbox, and I feel that's really unclean.
|
||||
|
||||
IMAP SEARCH BEFORE disregards time and timezone information. This should at
|
||||
least be documented. E.g. I've found that '-d 0' didn't match all messages in
|
||||
an IMAP mailbox. This is because the SEARCH key is (BEFORE 14-Nov-2007) on 14
|
||||
|
@ -111,15 +100,10 @@ Perhaps find a clean, lean replacement for all that clutter in the IMAP urls.
|
|||
Require --output-dir for IMAP archiving? Otherwise we just drop the archive in
|
||||
in the current working directory.
|
||||
|
||||
Switch to fcntl(2) locking? That would be NFS-safe. Perhaps make the locking
|
||||
method configurable?
|
||||
|
||||
Check all items below, which are from the original author. :-)
|
||||
|
||||
.archivemailrc support
|
||||
|
||||
Specify an option to not seteuid() when run as root?
|
||||
|
||||
When you get a file-not-found in the 6th mailbox of 10, it aborts the whole
|
||||
run. Better to fail gracefully and keep going.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -131,11 +115,6 @@ Add more tests (see top of test_archivemail.py)
|
|||
We need some better checking to see if we are really looking at a valid
|
||||
mbox-format mailbox.
|
||||
|
||||
Lock any original .gz files
|
||||
- is this necessary?
|
||||
|
||||
Check for symlink attacks for tempfiles (although we don't use /var/tmp)
|
||||
|
||||
Add an option to not cut threads.
|
||||
|
||||
Add MMDF mailbox support
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -22,9 +22,7 @@ Unit-test archivemail using 'PyUnit'.
|
|||
|
||||
TODO: add tests for:
|
||||
* dotlock locks already existing
|
||||
* archiving maildir-format mailboxes
|
||||
* archiving MH-format mailboxes
|
||||
* preservation of status information from maildir to mbox
|
||||
* a 3rd party process changing the mbox file being read
|
||||
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue