2017-02-14 20:40:20 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. somewhat surprisingly the "bash" highlighter gives nice results with
|
|
|
|
the pseudo-code notation used in the "Encryption" section.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. highlight:: bash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
========
|
|
|
|
Security
|
|
|
|
========
|
|
|
|
|
2017-02-17 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
.. _borgcrypto:
|
|
|
|
|
2017-02-14 20:40:20 +00:00
|
|
|
Cryptography in Borg
|
|
|
|
====================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attack model
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The attack model of Borg is that the environment of the client process
|
|
|
|
(e.g. ``borg create``) is trusted and the repository (server) is not. The
|
|
|
|
attacker has any and all access to the repository, including interactive
|
|
|
|
manipulation (man-in-the-middle) for remote repositories.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furthermore the client environment is assumed to be persistent across
|
|
|
|
attacks (practically this means that the security database cannot be
|
|
|
|
deleted between attacks).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under these circumstances Borg guarantees that the attacker cannot
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. modify the data of any archive without the client detecting the change
|
|
|
|
2. rename, remove or add an archive without the client detecting the change
|
|
|
|
3. recover plain-text data
|
|
|
|
4. recover definite (heuristics based on access patterns are possible)
|
|
|
|
structural information such as the object graph (which archives
|
|
|
|
refer to what chunks)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The attacker can always impose a denial of service per definition (he could
|
|
|
|
forbid connections to the repository, or delete it entirely).
|
|
|
|
|
2017-06-04 16:17:38 +00:00
|
|
|
.. _security_structural_auth:
|
|
|
|
|
2017-02-14 20:40:20 +00:00
|
|
|
Structural Authentication
|
|
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borg is fundamentally based on an object graph structure (see :ref:`internals`),
|
|
|
|
where the root object is called the manifest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borg follows the `Horton principle`_, which states that
|
|
|
|
not only the message must be authenticated, but also its meaning (often
|
|
|
|
expressed through context), because every object used is referenced by a
|
|
|
|
parent object through its object ID up to the manifest. The object ID in
|
|
|
|
Borg is a MAC of the object's plaintext, therefore this ensures that
|
|
|
|
an attacker cannot change the context of an object without forging the MAC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In other words, the object ID itself only authenticates the plaintext of the
|
|
|
|
object and not its context or meaning. The latter is established by a different
|
|
|
|
object referring to an object ID, thereby assigning a particular meaning to
|
|
|
|
an object. For example, an archive item contains a list of object IDs that
|
|
|
|
represent packed file metadata. On their own it's not clear that these objects
|
|
|
|
would represent what they do, but by the archive item referring to them
|
|
|
|
in a particular part of its own data structure assigns this meaning.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This results in a directed acyclic graph of authentication from the manifest
|
|
|
|
to the data chunks of individual files.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-06-04 12:13:04 +00:00
|
|
|
.. _tam_description:
|
|
|
|
|
2017-02-14 20:40:20 +00:00
|
|
|
.. rubric:: Authenticating the manifest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since the manifest has a fixed ID (000...000) the aforementioned authentication
|
|
|
|
does not apply to it, indeed, cannot apply to it; it is impossible to authenticate
|
|
|
|
the root node of a DAG through its edges, since the root node has no incoming edges.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With the scheme as described so far an attacker could easily replace the manifest,
|
|
|
|
therefore Borg includes a tertiary authentication mechanism (TAM) that is applied
|
|
|
|
to the manifest since version 1.0.9 (see :ref:`tam_vuln`).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TAM works by deriving a separate key through HKDF_ from the other encryption and
|
|
|
|
authentication keys and calculating the HMAC of the metadata to authenticate [#]_::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# RANDOM(n) returns n random bytes
|
|
|
|
salt = RANDOM(64)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ikm = id_key || enc_key || enc_hmac_key
|
|
|
|
# *context* depends on the operation, for manifest authentication it is
|
|
|
|
# the ASCII string "borg-metadata-authentication-manifest".
|
|
|
|
tam_key = HKDF-SHA-512(ikm, salt, context)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# *data* is a dict-like structure
|
|
|
|
data[hmac] = zeroes
|
|
|
|
packed = pack(data)
|
|
|
|
data[hmac] = HMAC(tam_key, packed)
|
|
|
|
packed_authenticated = pack(data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since an attacker cannot gain access to this key and also cannot make the
|
|
|
|
client authenticate arbitrary data using this mechanism, the attacker is unable
|
|
|
|
to forge the authentication.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This effectively 'anchors' the manifest to the key, which is controlled by the
|
|
|
|
client, thereby anchoring the entire DAG, making it impossible for an attacker
|
|
|
|
to add, remove or modify any part of the DAG without Borg being able to detect
|
|
|
|
the tampering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that when using BORG_PASSPHRASE the attacker cannot swap the *entire*
|
|
|
|
repository against a new repository with e.g. repokey mode and no passphrase,
|
|
|
|
because Borg will abort access when BORG_PASSPRHASE is incorrect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
However, interactively a user might not notice this kind of attack
|
|
|
|
immediately, if she assumes that the reason for the absent passphrase
|
|
|
|
prompt is a set BORG_PASSPHRASE. See issue :issue:`2169` for details.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. [#] The reason why the authentication tag is stored in the packed
|
|
|
|
data itself is that older Borg versions can still read the
|
|
|
|
manifest this way, while a changed layout would have broken
|
|
|
|
compatibility.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Encryption
|
|
|
|
----------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Encryption is currently based on the Encrypt-then-MAC construction,
|
|
|
|
which is generally seen as the most robust way to create an authenticated
|
|
|
|
encryption scheme from encryption and message authentication primitives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Every operation (encryption, MAC / authentication, chunk ID derivation)
|
|
|
|
uses independent, random keys generated by `os.urandom`_ [#]_.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borg does not support unauthenticated encryption -- only authenticated encryption
|
|
|
|
schemes are supported. No unauthenticated encryption schemes will be added
|
|
|
|
in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depending on the chosen mode (see :ref:`borg_init`) different primitives are used:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- The actual encryption is currently always AES-256 in CTR mode. The
|
|
|
|
counter is added in plaintext, since it is needed for decryption,
|
|
|
|
and is also tracked locally on the client to avoid counter reuse.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- The authentication primitive is either HMAC-SHA-256 or BLAKE2b-256
|
|
|
|
in a keyed mode. HMAC-SHA-256 uses 256 bit keys, while BLAKE2b-256
|
|
|
|
uses 512 bit keys.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The latter is secure not only because BLAKE2b itself is not
|
|
|
|
susceptible to `length extension`_, but also since it truncates the
|
|
|
|
hash output from 512 bits to 256 bits, which would make the
|
|
|
|
construction safe even if BLAKE2b were broken regarding length
|
|
|
|
extension or similar attacks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- The primitive used for authentication is always the same primitive
|
|
|
|
that is used for deriving the chunk ID, but they are always
|
|
|
|
used with independent keys.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Encryption::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
id = AUTHENTICATOR(id_key, data)
|
|
|
|
compressed = compress(data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
iv = reserve_iv()
|
|
|
|
encrypted = AES-256-CTR(enc_key, 8-null-bytes || iv, compressed)
|
|
|
|
authenticated = type-byte || AUTHENTICATOR(enc_hmac_key, encrypted) || iv || encrypted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decryption::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Given: input *authenticated* data, possibly a *chunk-id* to assert
|
|
|
|
type-byte, mac, iv, encrypted = SPLIT(authenticated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT(type-byte is correct)
|
|
|
|
ASSERT( CONSTANT-TIME-COMPARISON( mac, AUTHENTICATOR(enc_hmac_key, encrypted) ) )
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
decrypted = AES-256-CTR(enc_key, 8-null-bytes || iv, encrypted)
|
|
|
|
decompressed = decompress(decrypted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT( CONSTANT-TIME-COMPARISON( chunk-id, AUTHENTICATOR(id_key, decompressed) ) )
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-13 09:04:45 +00:00
|
|
|
The client needs to track which counter values have been used, since
|
|
|
|
encrypting a chunk requires a starting counter value and no two chunks
|
|
|
|
may have overlapping counter ranges (otherwise the bitwise XOR of the
|
|
|
|
overlapping plaintexts is revealed).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The client does not directly track the counter value, because it
|
|
|
|
changes often (with each encrypted chunk), instead it commits a
|
|
|
|
"reservation" to the security database and the repository by taking
|
|
|
|
the current counter value and adding 4 GiB / 16 bytes (the block size)
|
|
|
|
to the counter. Thus the client only needs to commit a new reservation
|
|
|
|
every few gigabytes of encrypted data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This mechanism also avoids reusing counter values in case the client
|
|
|
|
crashes or the connection to the repository is severed, since any
|
|
|
|
reservation would have been committed to both the security database
|
|
|
|
and the repository before any data is encrypted. Borg uses its
|
|
|
|
standard mechanism (SaveFile) to ensure that reservations are durable
|
|
|
|
(on most hardware / storage systems), therefore a crash of the
|
|
|
|
client's host would not impact tracking of reservations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
However, this design is not infallible, and requires synchronization
|
|
|
|
between clients, which is handled through the repository. Therefore in
|
|
|
|
a multiple-client scenario a repository can trick a client into
|
|
|
|
reusing counter values by ignoring counter reservations and replaying
|
|
|
|
the manifest (which will fail if the client has seen a more recent
|
|
|
|
manifest or has a more recent nonce reservation). If the repository is
|
|
|
|
untrusted, but a trusted synchronization channel exists between
|
|
|
|
clients, the security database could be synchronized between them over
|
|
|
|
said trusted channel. This is not part of Borgs functionality.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-02-14 20:40:20 +00:00
|
|
|
.. [#] Using the :ref:`borg key migrate-to-repokey <borg_key_migrate-to-repokey>`
|
|
|
|
command a user can convert repositories created using Attic in "passphrase"
|
|
|
|
mode to "repokey" mode. In this case the keys were directly derived from
|
|
|
|
the user's passphrase at some point using PBKDF2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borg does not support "passphrase" mode otherwise any more.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-02-17 23:01:53 +00:00
|
|
|
.. _key_encryption:
|
|
|
|
|
2017-02-14 20:40:20 +00:00
|
|
|
Offline key security
|
|
|
|
--------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borg cannot secure the key material while it is running, because the keys
|
|
|
|
are needed in plain to decrypt/encrypt repository objects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For offline storage of the encryption keys they are encrypted with a
|
|
|
|
user-chosen passphrase.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A 256 bit key encryption key (KEK) is derived from the passphrase
|
|
|
|
using PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256 with a random 256 bit salt which is then used
|
2017-02-17 23:01:53 +00:00
|
|
|
to Encrypt-*and*-MAC (unlike the Encrypt-*then*-MAC approach used
|
|
|
|
otherwise) a packed representation of the keys with AES-256-CTR with a
|
|
|
|
constant initialization vector of 0. A HMAC-SHA256 of the plaintext is
|
|
|
|
generated using the same KEK and is stored alongside the ciphertext,
|
|
|
|
which is converted to base64 in its entirety.
|
2017-02-14 20:40:20 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This base64 blob (commonly referred to as *keyblob*) is then stored in
|
|
|
|
the key file or in the repository config (keyfile and repokey modes
|
|
|
|
respectively).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This scheme, and specifically the use of a constant IV with the CTR
|
|
|
|
mode, is secure because an identical passphrase will result in a
|
2017-02-17 23:01:53 +00:00
|
|
|
different derived KEK for every key encryption due to the salt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The use of Encrypt-and-MAC instead of Encrypt-then-MAC is seen as
|
|
|
|
uncritical (but not ideal) here, since it is combined with AES-CTR mode,
|
|
|
|
which is not vulnerable to padding attacks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. seealso::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refer to the :ref:`key_files` section for details on the format.
|
2017-02-14 20:40:20 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-02-17 23:01:53 +00:00
|
|
|
Refer to issue :issue:`747` for suggested improvements of the encryption
|
|
|
|
scheme and password-based key derivation.
|
2017-02-17 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-02-14 20:40:20 +00:00
|
|
|
Implementations used
|
|
|
|
--------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We do not implement cryptographic primitives ourselves, but rely
|
|
|
|
on widely used libraries providing them:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- AES-CTR and HMAC-SHA-256 from OpenSSL 1.0 / 1.1 are used,
|
|
|
|
which is also linked into the static binaries we provide.
|
|
|
|
We think this is not an additional risk, since we don't ever
|
|
|
|
use OpenSSL's networking, TLS or X.509 code, but only their
|
|
|
|
primitives implemented in libcrypto.
|
2017-06-02 11:05:54 +00:00
|
|
|
- SHA-256 and SHA-512 from Python's hashlib_ standard library module are used.
|
|
|
|
Borg requires a Python built with OpenSSL support (due to PBKDF2), therefore
|
|
|
|
these functions are delegated to OpenSSL by Python.
|
2017-02-14 20:40:20 +00:00
|
|
|
- HMAC, PBKDF2 and a constant-time comparison from Python's hmac_ standard
|
2017-06-02 11:05:54 +00:00
|
|
|
library module is used. While the HMAC implementation is written in Python,
|
|
|
|
the PBKDF2 implementation is provided by OpenSSL. The constant-time comparison
|
|
|
|
(``compare_digest``) is written in C and part of Python.
|
2017-02-14 20:40:20 +00:00
|
|
|
- BLAKE2b is either provided by the system's libb2, an official implementation,
|
|
|
|
or a bundled copy of the BLAKE2 reference implementation (written in C).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implemented cryptographic constructions are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Encrypt-then-MAC based on AES-256-CTR and either HMAC-SHA-256
|
|
|
|
or keyed BLAKE2b256 as described above under Encryption_.
|
2017-02-17 23:01:53 +00:00
|
|
|
- Encrypt-and-MAC based on AES-256-CTR and HMAC-SHA-256
|
|
|
|
as described above under `Offline key security`_.
|
2017-02-14 20:40:20 +00:00
|
|
|
- HKDF_-SHA-512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _Horton principle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horton_Principle
|
|
|
|
.. _HKDF: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5869
|
|
|
|
.. _length extension: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Length_extension_attack
|
|
|
|
.. _hashlib: https://docs.python.org/3/library/hashlib.html
|
|
|
|
.. _hmac: https://docs.python.org/3/library/hmac.html
|
|
|
|
.. _os.urandom: https://docs.python.org/3/library/os.html#os.urandom
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remote RPC protocol security
|
|
|
|
============================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. note:: This section could be further expanded / detailed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The RPC protocol is fundamentally based on msgpack'd messages exchanged
|
|
|
|
over an encrypted SSH channel (the system's SSH client is used for this
|
|
|
|
by piping data from/to it).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This means that the authorization and transport security properties
|
2017-03-13 09:16:08 +00:00
|
|
|
are inherited from SSH and the configuration of the SSH client and the
|
|
|
|
SSH server -- Borg RPC does not contain *any* networking
|
|
|
|
code. Networking is done by the SSH client running in a separate
|
|
|
|
process, Borg only communicates over the standard pipes (stdout,
|
|
|
|
stderr and stdin) with this process. This also means that Borg doesn't
|
|
|
|
have to directly use a SSH client (or SSH at all). For example,
|
|
|
|
``sudo`` or ``qrexec`` could be used as an intermediary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By using the system's SSH client and not implementing a
|
|
|
|
(cryptographic) network protocol Borg sidesteps many security issues
|
|
|
|
that would normally impact distributing statically linked / standalone
|
|
|
|
binaries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The remainder of this section will focus on the security of the RPC
|
|
|
|
protocol within Borg.
|
2017-02-14 20:40:20 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The assumed worst-case a server can inflict to a client is a
|
|
|
|
denial of repository service.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The situation were a server can create a general DoS on the client
|
|
|
|
should be avoided, but might be possible by e.g. forcing the client to
|
|
|
|
allocate large amounts of memory to decode large messages (or messages
|
2017-02-18 06:15:53 +00:00
|
|
|
that merely indicate a large amount of data follows). The RPC protocol
|
|
|
|
code uses a limited msgpack Unpacker to prohibit this.
|
2017-02-14 20:40:20 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We believe that other kinds of attacks, especially critical vulnerabilities
|
|
|
|
like remote code execution are inhibited by the design of the protocol:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. The server cannot send requests to the client on its own accord,
|
|
|
|
it only can send responses. This avoids "unexpected inversion of control"
|
|
|
|
issues.
|
|
|
|
2. msgpack serialization does not allow embedding or referencing code that
|
|
|
|
is automatically executed. Incoming messages are unpacked by the msgpack
|
|
|
|
unpacker into native Python data structures (like tuples and dictionaries),
|
|
|
|
which are then passed to the rest of the program.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional verification of the correct form of the responses could be implemented.
|
|
|
|
3. Remote errors are presented in two forms:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. A simple plain-text *stderr* channel. A prefix string indicates the kind of message
|
|
|
|
(e.g. WARNING, INFO, ERROR), which is used to suppress it according to the
|
|
|
|
log level selected in the client.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A server can send arbitrary log messages, which may confuse a user. However,
|
|
|
|
log messages are only processed when server requests are in progress, therefore
|
|
|
|
the server cannot interfere / confuse with security critical dialogue like
|
|
|
|
the password prompt.
|
|
|
|
2. Server-side exceptions passed over the main data channel. These follow the
|
|
|
|
general pattern of server-sent responses and are sent instead of response data
|
|
|
|
for a request.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-06-02 10:21:59 +00:00
|
|
|
The msgpack implementation used (msgpack-python) has a good security track record,
|
|
|
|
a large test suite and no issues found by fuzzing. It is based on the msgpack-c implementation,
|
|
|
|
sharing the unpacking engine and some support code. msgpack-c has a good track record as well.
|
|
|
|
Some issues [#]_ in the past were located in code not included in msgpack-python.
|
|
|
|
Borg does not use msgpack-c.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. [#] - `MessagePack fuzzing <https://blog.gypsyengineer.com/fun/msgpack-fuzzing.html>`_
|
|
|
|
- `Fixed integer overflow and EXT size problem <https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack-c/pull/547>`_
|
|
|
|
- `Fixed array and map size overflow <https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack-c/pull/550>`_
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using OpenSSL
|
|
|
|
=============
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borg uses the OpenSSL library for most cryptography (see `Implementations used`_ above).
|
|
|
|
OpenSSL is bundled with static releases, thus the bundled copy is not updated with system
|
|
|
|
updates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OpenSSL is a large and complex piece of software and has had its share of vulnerabilities,
|
|
|
|
however, it is important to note that Borg links against ``libcrypto`` **not** ``libssl``.
|
2017-06-02 10:52:30 +00:00
|
|
|
libcrypto is the low-level cryptography part of OpenSSL,
|
|
|
|
while libssl implements TLS and related protocols.
|
2017-06-02 10:21:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-06-02 10:52:30 +00:00
|
|
|
The latter is not used by Borg (cf. `Remote RPC protocol security`_, Borg itself does not implement
|
|
|
|
any network access) and historically contained most vulnerabilities, especially critical ones.
|
|
|
|
The static binaries released by the project contain neither libssl nor the Python ssl/_ssl modules.
|