mirror of
https://github.com/borgbackup/borg.git
synced 2024-12-23 16:26:29 +00:00
Elaborate on append-only mode docs
This commit is contained in:
parent
091bd2bd79
commit
cb2b86274e
1 changed files with 15 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -208,6 +208,9 @@ To activate append-only mode, set ``append_only`` to 1 in the repository config:
|
|||
|
||||
borg config /path/to/repo append_only 1
|
||||
|
||||
Note that you can go back-and-forth between normal and append-only operation with
|
||||
``borg config``; it's not a "one way trip."
|
||||
|
||||
In append-only mode Borg will create a transaction log in the ``transactions`` file,
|
||||
where each line is a transaction and a UTC timestamp.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -278,10 +281,19 @@ won't free disk space, they merely tag data as deleted in a new transaction.
|
|||
Be aware that as soon as you write to the repo in non-append-only mode (e.g. prune,
|
||||
delete or create archives from an admin machine), it will remove the deleted objects
|
||||
permanently (including the ones that were already marked as deleted, but not removed,
|
||||
in append-only mode).
|
||||
in append-only mode). Automated edits to the repository (such as a cron job running
|
||||
``borg prune``) will render append-only mode moot if data is deleted.
|
||||
|
||||
Note that you can go back-and-forth between normal and append-only operation by editing
|
||||
the configuration file, it's not a "one way trip".
|
||||
Even if an archive appears to be available, it is possible an attacker could delete
|
||||
just a few chunks from an archive and silently corrupt its data. While in append-only
|
||||
mode, this is reversible, but ``borg check`` should be run before a writing/pruning
|
||||
operation on an append-only repository to catch accidental or malicious corruption::
|
||||
|
||||
# run without append-only mode
|
||||
borg check --verify-data repo && borg compact repo
|
||||
|
||||
Aside from checking repository & archive integrity you may want to also manually check
|
||||
backups to ensure their content seems correct.
|
||||
|
||||
Further considerations
|
||||
++++++++++++++++++++++
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue