from unittest import TestCase from cStringIO import StringIO import simplejson as json class TestDump(TestCase): def test_dump(self): sio = StringIO() json.dump({}, sio) self.assertEquals(sio.getvalue(), '{}') def test_dumps(self): self.assertEquals(json.dumps({}), '{}') def test_encode_truefalse(self): self.assertEquals(json.dumps( {True: False, False: True}, sort_keys=True), '{"false": true, "true": false}') self.assertEquals(json.dumps( {2: 3.0, 4.0: 5L, False: 1, 6L: True, "7": 0}, sort_keys=True), '{"false": 1, "2": 3.0, "4.0": 5, "6": true, "7": 0}') def test_ordered_dict(self): # http://bugs.python.org/issue6105 items = [('one', 1), ('two', 2), ('three', 3), ('four', 4), ('five', 5)] s = json.dumps(json.OrderedDict(items)) self.assertEqual(s, '{"one": 1, "two": 2, "three": 3, "four": 4, "five": 5}') def test_indent_unknown_type_acceptance(self): """ A test against the regression mentioned at `github issue 29`_. The indent parameter should accept any type which pretends to be an instance of int or long when it comes to being multiplied by strings, even if it is not actually an int or long, for backwards compatibility. .. _github issue 29: http://github.com/simplejson/simplejson/issue/29 """ class AwesomeInt(object): """An awesome reimplementation of integers""" def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs): if len(args) > 0: # [construct from literals, objects, etc.] # ... # Finally, if args[0] is an integer, store it if isinstance(args[0], int): self._int = args[0] # [various methods] def __mul__(self, other): # [various ways to multiply AwesomeInt objects] # ... finally, if the right-hand operand is not awesome enough, # try to do a normal integer multiplication if hasattr(self, '_int'): return self._int * other else: raise NotImplementedError("To do non-awesome things with" " this object, please construct it from an integer!") s = json.dumps(range(3), indent=AwesomeInt(3)) self.assertEqual(s, '[\n 0,\n 1,\n 2\n]')