mirror
/
restic
mirror of https://github.com/restic/restic.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity
4,620 Commits 7 Branches 49 Tags 92 MiB
Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alexander Weiss a666a6d576 Add tests and merge indexes in index benchmarks 2020-07-22 21:54:02 +02:00
Alexander Weiss 3b7a3711e6 Add more realistic index benchmarks 
+ reduce test size of BenchmarkMasterIndexLookupParallel
 2020-07-21 07:18:20 +02:00
greatroar 255ba83c4b Parallel index benchmarks + benchmark optimizations 
createRandomIndex was using the global RNG, which locks on every call
It was also using twice as many random numbers as necessary and doing
a float division in every iteration of the inner loop.

BenchmarkDecodeIndex was using too short an input, especially for a
parallel version. (It may now be using one that is a bit large.)

Results on linux/amd64, -benchtime=3s -count=20:

name                                     old time/op    new time/op       delta
PackerManager-8                             178ms ± 0%        178ms ± 0%           ~     (p=0.165 n=20+20)
DecodeIndex-8                              13.6µs ± 2%  4539886.8µs ± 0%  +33293901.38%  (p=0.000 n=20+18)
IndexHasUnknown-8                          44.4ns ± 7%       44.4ns ± 5%           ~     (p=0.873 n=20+19)
IndexHasKnown-8                            49.2ns ± 3%       48.3ns ± 0%         -1.86%  (p=0.000 n=20+16)
IndexAlloc-8                                802ms ± 1%        758ms ± 1%         -5.51%  (p=0.000 n=20+19)
MasterIndexLookupSingleIndex-8              124ns ± 1%        122ns ± 0%         -1.41%  (p=0.000 n=20+14)
MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndex-8            373ns ± 2%        369ns ± 2%         -1.13%  (p=0.001 n=20+20)
MasterIndexLookupSingleIndexUnknown-8      67.8ns ± 3%       68.4ns ± 5%           ~     (p=0.753 n=20+20)
MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndexUnknown-8     316ns ± 3%        315ns ± 3%           ~     (p=0.846 n=20+20)
SaveAndEncrypt-8                           30.5ms ± 1%       30.2ms ± 1%         -1.09%  (p=0.000 n=19+19)
LoadTree-8                                  527µs ± 1%        540µs ± 1%         +2.37%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)
LoadBlob-8                                 5.65ms ± 0%       5.64ms ± 0%         -0.21%  (p=0.000 n=19+18)
LoadAndDecrypt-8                           7.07ms ± 2%       5.93ms ± 0%        -16.15%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)
LoadIndex-8                                32.1ms ± 2%       25.1ms ± 0%        -21.64%  (p=0.000 n=20+18)

name                                     old speed      new speed         delta
PackerManager-8                           296MB/s ± 0%      296MB/s ± 0%           ~     (p=0.159 n=20+20)
SaveAndEncrypt-8                          138MB/s ± 1%      139MB/s ± 1%         +1.10%  (p=0.000 n=19+19)
LoadBlob-8                                177MB/s ± 0%      177MB/s ± 0%         +0.21%  (p=0.000 n=19+18)
LoadAndDecrypt-8                          141MB/s ± 2%      169MB/s ± 0%        +19.24%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)

name                                     old alloc/op   new alloc/op      delta
PackerManager-8                            91.8kB ± 0%       91.8kB ± 0%           ~     (p=0.826 n=19+12)
IndexAlloc-8                                786MB ± 0%        786MB ± 0%         +0.01%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)
SaveAndEncrypt-8                           21.0MB ± 0%       21.0MB ± 0%         -0.00%  (p=0.012 n=20+19)

name                                     old allocs/op  new allocs/op     delta
PackerManager-8                             1.41k ± 0%        1.41k ± 0%           ~     (all equal)
IndexAlloc-8                                 977k ± 0%         977k ± 0%         +0.01%  (p=0.022 n=20+20)
SaveAndEncrypt-8                             73.0 ± 0%         73.0 ± 0%           ~     (all equal)
 2020-07-19 13:58:05 +02:00
Matthew Dawson df2c03a6a4
repository/master_index: Optimize Index.Lookup() 
When looking up a blob in the master index, with several
indexes present in the master index, a significant amount of time
is spent generating errors for each failed lookup.  However, these
errors are often used to check if a blob is present, but the contents
are not inspected making the overhead of the error not useful.

Instead, change Index.Lookup (and Index.LookupSize) to instead return
a boolean denoting if the blob was found instead of an error.  Also change
all the calls to these functions to handle the new function signature.

benchmark                                            old ns/op     new ns/op     delta
BenchmarkMasterIndexLookupSingleIndex-6              820           897           +9.39%
BenchmarkMasterIndexLookupMultipleIndex-6            12821         2001          -84.39%
BenchmarkMasterIndexLookupSingleIndexUnknown-6       5378          492           -90.85%
BenchmarkMasterIndexLookupMultipleIndexUnknown-6     17026         1649          -90.31%

benchmark                                            old allocs     new allocs     delta
BenchmarkMasterIndexLookupSingleIndex-6              9              9              +0.00%
BenchmarkMasterIndexLookupMultipleIndex-6            59             19             -67.80%
BenchmarkMasterIndexLookupSingleIndexUnknown-6       22             6              -72.73%
BenchmarkMasterIndexLookupMultipleIndexUnknown-6     72             16             -77.78%

benchmark                                            old bytes     new bytes     delta
BenchmarkMasterIndexLookupSingleIndex-6              160           160           +0.00%
BenchmarkMasterIndexLookupMultipleIndex-6            3200          240           -92.50%
BenchmarkMasterIndexLookupSingleIndexUnknown-6       1232          48            -96.10%
BenchmarkMasterIndexLookupMultipleIndexUnknown-6     4272          128           -97.00%
 2018-01-23 22:25:56 -05:00