d6cfe857b7
pass proper context into MasterIndex.RebuildIndex
2020-10-09 22:39:07 +02:00
a449450021
init: pass proper context to master key generation
...
This is no change in behavior as a canceled context did later on cause
the config file creation to fail. Therefore this change just lets the
repository initialization fail a bit earlier.
2020-10-09 22:37:56 +02:00
c458e114d4
pass context to Find / FindSnapshot
...
This allows proper interruption of restic while it searches for
snapshots or key files.
2020-10-09 22:37:56 +02:00
f003410402
init: Add `--copy-chunker-params` option
...
This allows creating multiple repositories with identical chunker
parameters which is required for working deduplication when copying
snapshots between different repositories.
2020-09-19 16:53:05 +02:00
23fcbb275a
Remove restic.Cache interface
...
It was used in one code path, which then asserted its concrete type as
*cache.Cache.
Privatised some of the interface methods.
2020-09-18 10:48:13 +02:00
c46edcd9d6
error strings should not end with punctuation
2020-09-05 10:07:17 +02:00
d0329cf3eb
Adjust comments to match name of exported methods
2020-09-05 10:07:16 +02:00
4784540f04
repository: Simplify worker group code
2020-09-05 10:07:16 +02:00
d9a80e07b9
repository: Simplify index age calculation
2020-09-05 10:07:16 +02:00
2f8335554c
Remove a few unused variables
2020-09-05 10:06:23 +02:00
f4b9544ab2
prune: Add test that repack aborts on wrong blob
2020-08-16 11:34:01 +02:00
367449dede
prune: Reduce memory allocations while repacking
...
The slicing operator `slice[low:high]` default to 0 for the lower bound and
len(slice) for the upper bound when either or both are not specified.
Fix the code to use `cap(slice)` to check for the slice capacity.
2020-08-16 11:34:01 +02:00
7042bafea5
prune: Abort repacking when a pack contains a wrong blob
...
If a blob in a pack file can be decrypted successfully but contains data
that results in a different hash than stated in the header pack, then
abort repacking. As both the pack header and the blob are
cryptographically verified this either means than a malicious entity
tampered with the backup or indicates hardware problems on the client.
prune should fail with an error in both cases.
2020-08-16 11:34:01 +02:00
0fed6a8dfc
Use "pack file" instead of "data file" ( #2885 )
...
- changed variable names, especially changed DataFile into PackFile
- changed in some comments
- always use "pack file" in docu
2020-08-16 11:16:38 +02:00
eca0f0ad24
Merge pull request #2863 from aawsome/index-no-duplicates
...
Don't save exact duplicates in merged index
2020-08-08 18:24:14 +02:00
b112533812
Don't save exact duplicates when merging indexes
2020-08-05 06:32:02 +02:00
5e63294355
Add benchmark MasterIndexAlloc
2020-08-05 06:32:02 +02:00
05116e4787
prune: Cleanup progress bar handling while repacking
2020-08-03 19:32:46 +02:00
2580eef2aa
Merge pull request #2318 from classmarkets/2175-named-keys
...
Allow specifying user and host when adding keys
2020-08-01 13:06:31 +02:00
c847aace35
Rename Index interface to MasterIndex
...
The interface is now only implemented by repository.MasterIndex.
2020-07-25 21:19:46 +02:00
9d1fb94c6c
make Lookup() return all blobs
...
+ simplify syntax
2020-07-25 21:18:34 +02:00
309598c237
Simplify sortCachedPacksFirst test in internal/repository
...
The test now uses the fact that the sort is stable. It's not guaranteed
to be, but the test is cleaner and more exhaustive. sortCachedPacksFirst
no longer needs a return value.
2020-07-25 12:12:59 +02:00
03d23e6faa
Speed up blob sorting in internal/repository
...
name old time/op new time/op delta
SortCachedPacksFirst-8 208µs ± 3% 186µs ± 3% -10.74% (p=0.000 n=10+8)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
SortCachedPacksFirst-8 213kB ± 0% 139kB ± 0% -34.62% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
SortCachedPacksFirst-8 1.03k ± 0% 1.03k ± 0% -0.19% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
2020-07-25 12:12:59 +02:00
b10acd2af7
Test and benchmark blob sorting in internal/repository
2020-07-25 12:12:58 +02:00
a666a6d576
Add tests and merge indexes in index benchmarks
2020-07-22 21:54:02 +02:00
e388d962a5
Merge final indexes together for faster index access
2020-07-22 21:54:02 +02:00
3b7a3711e6
Add more realistic index benchmarks
...
+ reduce test size of BenchmarkMasterIndexLookupParallel
2020-07-21 07:18:20 +02:00
7bda28f31f
Chaining hash table for repository.Index
...
These are faster to construct but slower to access. The allocation rate
is halved, the peak memory usage almost halved compared to standard map.
Benchmark results on linux/amd64, -benchtime=3s -count=20:
name old time/op new time/op delta
PackerManager-8 178ms ± 0% 178ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.231 n=20+20)
DecodeIndex-8 4.54s ± 0% 4.30s ± 0% -5.20% (p=0.000 n=18+17)
DecodeIndexParallel-8 4.54s ± 0% 4.30s ± 0% -5.22% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
IndexHasUnknown-8 44.4ns ± 5% 50.5ns ±11% +13.82% (p=0.000 n=19+17)
IndexHasKnown-8 48.3ns ± 0% 51.5ns ±12% +6.68% (p=0.001 n=16+20)
IndexAlloc-8 758ms ± 1% 616ms ± 1% -18.69% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
IndexAllocParallel-8 234ms ± 3% 204ms ± 2% -12.60% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
MasterIndexLookupSingleIndex-8 122ns ± 0% 145ns ± 9% +18.44% (p=0.000 n=14+20)
MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndex-8 369ns ± 2% 429ns ± 8% +16.27% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
MasterIndexLookupSingleIndexUnknown-8 68.4ns ± 5% 74.9ns ±13% +9.47% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndexUnknown-8 315ns ± 3% 369ns ±11% +17.14% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
MasterIndexLookupParallel/known,indices=5-8 743ns ± 1% 816ns ± 2% +9.87% (p=0.000 n=17+17)
MasterIndexLookupParallel/unknown,indices=5-8 238ns ± 1% 260ns ± 2% +9.14% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
MasterIndexLookupParallel/known,indices=10-8 1.01µs ± 3% 1.11µs ± 2% +9.79% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
MasterIndexLookupParallel/unknown,indices=10-8 222ns ± 0% 269ns ± 2% +20.83% (p=0.000 n=16+20)
MasterIndexLookupParallel/known,indices=20-8 1.06µs ± 2% 1.19µs ± 2% +12.95% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
MasterIndexLookupParallel/unknown,indices=20-8 413ns ± 1% 530ns ± 1% +28.19% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
SaveAndEncrypt-8 30.2ms ± 1% 30.4ms ± 0% +0.71% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
LoadTree-8 540µs ± 1% 576µs ± 1% +6.73% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
LoadBlob-8 5.64ms ± 0% 5.64ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.883 n=18+17)
LoadAndDecrypt-8 5.93ms ± 0% 5.95ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.247 n=20+19)
LoadIndex-8 25.1ms ± 0% 24.5ms ± 1% -2.54% (p=0.000 n=18+17)
name old speed new speed delta
PackerManager-8 296MB/s ± 0% 296MB/s ± 0% ~ (p=0.229 n=20+20)
SaveAndEncrypt-8 139MB/s ± 1% 138MB/s ± 0% -0.71% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
LoadBlob-8 177MB/s ± 0% 177MB/s ± 0% ~ (p=0.890 n=18+17)
LoadAndDecrypt-8 169MB/s ± 0% 168MB/s ± 1% ~ (p=0.227 n=20+19)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
PackerManager-8 91.8kB ± 0% 91.8kB ± 0% ~ (p=0.772 n=12+19)
IndexAlloc-8 786MB ± 0% 400MB ± 0% -49.04% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
IndexAllocParallel-8 786MB ± 0% 401MB ± 0% -49.04% (p=0.000 n=19+15)
SaveAndEncrypt-8 21.0MB ± 0% 21.0MB ± 0% +0.00% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
PackerManager-8 1.41k ± 0% 1.41k ± 0% ~ (all equal)
IndexAlloc-8 977k ± 0% 907k ± 0% -7.18% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
IndexAllocParallel-8 977k ± 0% 907k ± 0% -7.17% (p=0.000 n=19+15)
SaveAndEncrypt-8 73.0 ± 0% 73.0 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
2020-07-19 13:58:22 +02:00
255ba83c4b
Parallel index benchmarks + benchmark optimizations
...
createRandomIndex was using the global RNG, which locks on every call
It was also using twice as many random numbers as necessary and doing
a float division in every iteration of the inner loop.
BenchmarkDecodeIndex was using too short an input, especially for a
parallel version. (It may now be using one that is a bit large.)
Results on linux/amd64, -benchtime=3s -count=20:
name old time/op new time/op delta
PackerManager-8 178ms ± 0% 178ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.165 n=20+20)
DecodeIndex-8 13.6µs ± 2% 4539886.8µs ± 0% +33293901.38% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
IndexHasUnknown-8 44.4ns ± 7% 44.4ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.873 n=20+19)
IndexHasKnown-8 49.2ns ± 3% 48.3ns ± 0% -1.86% (p=0.000 n=20+16)
IndexAlloc-8 802ms ± 1% 758ms ± 1% -5.51% (p=0.000 n=20+19)
MasterIndexLookupSingleIndex-8 124ns ± 1% 122ns ± 0% -1.41% (p=0.000 n=20+14)
MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndex-8 373ns ± 2% 369ns ± 2% -1.13% (p=0.001 n=20+20)
MasterIndexLookupSingleIndexUnknown-8 67.8ns ± 3% 68.4ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.753 n=20+20)
MasterIndexLookupMultipleIndexUnknown-8 316ns ± 3% 315ns ± 3% ~ (p=0.846 n=20+20)
SaveAndEncrypt-8 30.5ms ± 1% 30.2ms ± 1% -1.09% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
LoadTree-8 527µs ± 1% 540µs ± 1% +2.37% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
LoadBlob-8 5.65ms ± 0% 5.64ms ± 0% -0.21% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
LoadAndDecrypt-8 7.07ms ± 2% 5.93ms ± 0% -16.15% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
LoadIndex-8 32.1ms ± 2% 25.1ms ± 0% -21.64% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
name old speed new speed delta
PackerManager-8 296MB/s ± 0% 296MB/s ± 0% ~ (p=0.159 n=20+20)
SaveAndEncrypt-8 138MB/s ± 1% 139MB/s ± 1% +1.10% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
LoadBlob-8 177MB/s ± 0% 177MB/s ± 0% +0.21% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
LoadAndDecrypt-8 141MB/s ± 2% 169MB/s ± 0% +19.24% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
PackerManager-8 91.8kB ± 0% 91.8kB ± 0% ~ (p=0.826 n=19+12)
IndexAlloc-8 786MB ± 0% 786MB ± 0% +0.01% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
SaveAndEncrypt-8 21.0MB ± 0% 21.0MB ± 0% -0.00% (p=0.012 n=20+19)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
PackerManager-8 1.41k ± 0% 1.41k ± 0% ~ (all equal)
IndexAlloc-8 977k ± 0% 977k ± 0% +0.01% (p=0.022 n=20+20)
SaveAndEncrypt-8 73.0 ± 0% 73.0 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
2020-07-19 13:58:05 +02:00
02bec13ef2
Fix repository_test.BenchmarkSaveAndEncrypt
...
The benchmark was actually testing the speed of index lookups.
name old time/op new time/op delta
SaveAndEncrypt-8 101ns ± 2% 31505824ns ± 1% +31311591.31% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
name old speed new speed delta
SaveAndEncrypt-8 41.7TB/s ± 2% 0.0TB/s ± 1% -100.00% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
SaveAndEncrypt-8 1.00B ± 0% 20989508.40B ± 0% +2098950740.00% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
SaveAndEncrypt-8 0.00 123.00 ± 0% +Inf% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
(The actual speed is ca. 131MiB/s.)
2020-07-05 17:41:42 +02:00
1361341c58
don't save duplicate packIDs when using internal/repository/Index.Store
2020-06-14 07:56:24 +02:00
ce4a2f4ca6
save packIDs and duplicates separately
...
A side remark to the definition of Index.blob:
Another possibility would have been to use:
blob map[restic.BlobHandle]*indexEntry
This would have led to the following sizes:
key: 32 + 1 = 33 bytes
value: 8 bytes
indexEntry: 8 + 4 + 4 = 16 bytes
each packID: 32 bytes
To save N index entries, we would therefore have needed:
N * OF * (33 + 8) bytes + N * 16 + N * 32 bytes / BP = N * 82 bytes
More precicely, using a pointer instead of a direct entry is the better memory choice if:
OF * 8 bytes + entrysize < OF * entrysize <=> entrysize > 8 bytes * OF/(OF-1)
Under the assumption of OF=1.5, this means using pointers would have been the better choice
if sizeof(indexEntry) > 24 bytes.
2020-06-14 07:56:21 +02:00
cf979e2b81
make offset and length uint32
2020-06-14 07:50:19 +02:00
d92e2c5769
simplify index code
2020-06-14 07:50:19 +02:00
7419844885
add changelog, benchmark, memory calculation
2020-06-14 07:50:15 +02:00
dd7b4f54f5
Merge pull request #2709 from greatroar/minio-sha256
...
Use Minio's optimized SHA-256
2020-06-12 23:32:58 +02:00
735a8074d5
Merge pull request #2773 from aawsome/index-uploads+knownblobs
...
Fix non-intuitive repo behavior
2020-06-12 22:41:04 +02:00
70347e95d5
disable index uploads for prune command
...
+ modifications of changelog
2020-06-12 09:24:38 +02:00
91906911b0
Fix non-intuitive repository behavior
...
- The SaveBlob method now checks for duplicates.
- Moves handling of pending blobs to MasterIndex.
-> also cleans up pending index entries when they are saved in the index
-> when using SaveBlob no need to care about index any longer
- Always check for full index and save it when storing packs.
-> removes the need of an index uploader
-> also removes the verbose "uploaded intermediate index" messages
- The Flush method now also saves the index
- Fix race condition when checking and saving full/non-finalized indexes
2020-06-11 13:05:23 +02:00
6856d1e422
Merge pull request #2749 from aawsome/fix-fullindex
...
Change condition for full index
2020-06-10 20:40:19 +02:00
8c1261ff02
changed condition for full index
2020-06-07 22:00:49 +02:00
f97a680887
Fix repository benchmarks
...
BenchmarkLoad{AndDecrypt,Blob} were spending between 38% and 50% of
their time measuring SHA-256 performance in their checks.
2020-04-28 07:57:29 +02:00
42a3db05b0
Use Minio's optimized SHA-256
...
internal/repository benchmarks on an Intel i7-3770k:
name old speed new speed delta
PackerManager-8 209MB/s ± 1% 291MB/s ± 1% +38.94% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
SaveAndEncrypt-8 112MB/s ± 1% 135MB/s ± 1% +20.25% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
2020-04-28 07:57:18 +02:00
e7d7b85d59
Merge Repository.{LoadBlob,loadBlob}
...
Pushing the allocation logic down into the former loadBlob body means
that fewer allocations have to be performed:
name old time/op new time/op delta
LoadTree-8 478µs ± 1% 481µs ± 2% ~ (p=0.315 n=9+10)
LoadBlob-8 11.6ms ± 1% 11.6ms ± 2% ~ (p=0.393 n=10+10)
LoadAndDecrypt-8 13.3ms ± 3% 13.3ms ± 3% ~ (p=0.905 n=10+9)
LoadIndex-8 33.6ms ± 2% 33.2ms ± 1% -1.15% (p=0.028 n=10+9)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
LoadTree-8 41.2kB ± 0% 41.1kB ± 0% -0.23% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
LoadBlob-8 2.28kB ± 0% 2.18kB ± 0% -4.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
LoadAndDecrypt-8 2.10MB ± 0% 2.10MB ± 0% ~ (all equal)
LoadIndex-8 5.22MB ± 0% 5.22MB ± 0% ~ (p=0.631 n=10+10)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
LoadTree-8 652 ± 0% 651 ± 0% -0.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
LoadBlob-8 24.0 ± 0% 23.0 ± 0% -4.17% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
LoadAndDecrypt-8 30.0 ± 0% 30.0 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
LoadIndex-8 30.2k ± 0% 30.2k ± 0% ~ (p=0.610 n=10+10)
name old speed new speed delta
LoadBlob-8 86.4MB/s ± 1% 85.9MB/s ± 2% ~ (p=0.393 n=10+10)
LoadAndDecrypt-8 75.4MB/s ± 3% 75.4MB/s ± 3% ~ (p=0.858 n=10+9)
2020-04-23 10:04:20 +02:00
be5a0ff59f
Centralize buffer allocation and size checking in Repository.LoadBlob
...
Benchmark results for internal/repository:
name old time/op new time/op delta
LoadTree-8 479µs ± 2% 478µs ± 1% ~ (p=0.780 n=10+9)
LoadBlob-8 11.6ms ± 2% 11.6ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.631 n=10+10)
LoadAndDecrypt-8 13.2ms ± 2% 13.3ms ± 3% ~ (p=0.631 n=10+10)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
LoadTree-8 41.2kB ± 0% 41.2kB ± 0% ~ (all equal)
LoadBlob-8 2.28kB ± 0% 2.28kB ± 0% ~ (all equal)
LoadAndDecrypt-8 2.10MB ± 0% 2.10MB ± 0% ~ (all equal)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
LoadTree-8 652 ± 0% 652 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
LoadBlob-8 24.0 ± 0% 24.0 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
LoadAndDecrypt-8 30.0 ± 0% 30.0 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
name old speed new speed delta
LoadBlob-8 86.2MB/s ± 2% 86.4MB/s ± 1% ~ (p=0.594 n=10+10)
LoadAndDecrypt-8 75.7MB/s ± 2% 75.4MB/s ± 3% ~ (p=0.617 n=10+10)
2020-04-23 10:04:20 +02:00
16710454f4
Merge pull request #2628 from MichaelEischer/one-element-pack-lists
...
cache: Don't sort one element pack lists
2020-04-18 17:09:06 +02:00
a1352906e2
Merge pull request #2622 from greatroar/optimize-packer-manager
...
Fix PackerManager benchmark and optimize hashing.Writer
2020-04-18 12:46:34 +02:00
90fc639a67
Allow specifying user and host when adding keys
...
The username and hostname for new keys can be specified with the new
--user and --host flags, respectively. The flags are used only by the
`key add` command and are otherwise ignored.
This allows adding keys with for a desired user and host without having
to run restic as that particular user on that particular host, making
automated key management easier.
Co-authored-by: James TD Smith <ahktenzero@mohorovi.cc>
2020-03-23 13:11:10 +01:00
7d9300efca
Merge pull request #2637 from greatroar/unused
...
Remove Go 1.5 compatibility code
2020-03-18 22:22:15 +01:00
4de12bf593
Remove restic.RandReader
...
math/rand.Rand has implemented Reader since Go 1.6. The repacking tests
are not deterministic, but they weren't before, either.
2020-03-09 10:00:28 +01:00
Michael Eischer