The archiver first called the Select function for a path before checking
whether the Lstat on that path actually worked. The RejectFuncs in
exclude.go worked around this by checking whether they received a nil
os.FileInfo. Checking first is more obvious and requires less code.
Previously the directory stats were reported immediately after calling
`SaveDir`. However, as the latter method saves the tree asynchronously
the stats were still initialized to their nil value. The stats are now
reported via a callback similar to the one used for the fileSaver.
- The SaveBlob method now checks for duplicates.
- Moves handling of pending blobs to MasterIndex.
-> also cleans up pending index entries when they are saved in the index
-> when using SaveBlob no need to care about index any longer
- Always check for full index and save it when storing packs.
-> removes the need of an index uploader
-> also removes the verbose "uploaded intermediate index" messages
- The Flush method now also saves the index
- Fix race condition when checking and saving full/non-finalized indexes
The Save methods of the BlobSaver, FileSaver and TreeSaver return early
on when the archiver is stopped due to an error. For that they select on
both the tomb.Dying() and context.Done() channels, which can lead to a
race condition when the tomb is killed due to an error: The tomb first
closes its Dying channel before canceling all child contexts.
Archiver.SaveDir only aborts its execution once the context was
canceled. When the tomb killing is paused between closing its Dying
channel and canceling the child contexts, this lets the
FileSaver/TreeSaver.Save methods return immediately, however, ScanDir
still reads further files causing the test case to fail.
As a killed tomb always cancels all child contexts and as the Savers
always use a context bound to the tomb, it is sufficient to just use
context.Done() as escape hatch in the Save functions. This fixes the
mismatch between SaveDir and Save.
Adjust the tests to use contexts bound to the tomb for all interactions
with the Savers.
Archivers TestMetadataChanged incorrectly clears the Extended Attributes
from the expected metadata of the temporary file. This is incorrect as on
SELinux enabled filesystem, as the kernel will automaticly add a SElinux
label. However, since ExtendedAttributes{} != ExtendedAttributes{nil} we
still need to clear them if there are no attributes found.
internal/archiver.readdir and internal/fs.ReadDir were unused.
internal/fs.ReadDirNames and internal/archiver.readdirnames were doing
nearly the same thing, except one sorted its output and opened with
fs.O_NOFOLLOW. Both were only used in internal/archiver.
Each of the random test files was split into the same five blobs. The
test fails once the fifth blob is passed on to `SaveBlob`. That is for
certain interleavings of goroutine execution it would be possible for
the test to trigger the testErr just after storing the first file.
The fixed test uses a different file content for each of the nine files
and fails after writing the fourth blob. The file content is also small
enough to ensure that for each file only a single blob is saved. This
guarantees that the test cannot fail before reading the first four
files. FileReadConcurrency = 2 allows up to two files queued for
processing. Therefore the test can at most open the sixth file before it
has to save the fourth file / blob which triggers the testErr.
In some (rare) cases "fake" UID 51234 may exist in a system running a
test. When this is the case, `cmp.Equal(want, node3)` will fail based on
difference between empty string and an actual username present in a
system.
Fixes github issue #2372
Since I could not remember what the value for `Check` means this commit
renames it to `SameFile`: when set to true, the test should make sure
that `FileChanged` should return false (=file is unmodified).
This commit changes the internal file system implementation for reading
data from stdin, it now returns an error when no bytes could be read. I
think it's worth failing in this case, the user instructed restic to
read some data from stdin, and no data was read at all. Maybe it was in
a pipe and some earlier stage failed.
See #2135 for a short discussion.
Michael Eischer