* Support .git files (e.g. for worktrees, submodules)
* Fix symlinks in source tarball, switch to TXZ, adjust non-release name
* Remove autotools stuff
* fix: __attribute__(__printf__) warnings
* fix: implicit fallthrough warning
* fixup! fix: implicit fallthrough warning
* fix: disable warnings for 3rd party code
Since we want to leave upstream code as-is
* fixup! fix: disable warnings for 3rd party code
* fixup! fix: disable warnings for 3rd party code
* silence spurious alignment warning
Xrefs
Discussion: https://stackoverflow.com/a/35554349
Macro inspiration: 90ac46f710/f/src/util/util_safealign.h (_35)
* fixup! fix: disable warnings for 3rd party code
* fixup! fix: implicit fallthrough warning
* make uncrustify happy
* remove uncrustify-test.sh
that's probably off-topic for this PR
* fixup! fix: __attribute__(__printf__) warnings
* Update libtransmission/CMakeLists.txt
Co-Authored-By: ckerr <ckerr@github.com>
* fixup! silence spurious alignment warning
* use -w for DISABLE_WARNINGS in Clang
* refactor: fix libtransmission deprecation warnings
* fix: pthread_create's start_routine's return value
This was defined as `void` on non-Windows but should have been `void*`
* chore: uncrustify
* fix: add DISABLE_WARNINGS option for SunPro Studio
* fix "unused in lambda capture" warnings by clang++
* fix 'increases required alignment' warning
Caused from storing int16_t's in a char array.
* fix net.c 'increases required alignment' warning
The code passes in a `struct sockaddr_storage*` which is a padded struct
large enough for the necessary alignment. Unfortunately it was recast as
a `struct sockaddr*` which has less padding and a smaller alignment. The
warning occrred because of these differing alignments.
* make building quieter so warnings are more visible
* fixup! fix 'increases required alignment' warning
* Fix -Wcast-function-type warnings in GTK+ app code
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-terminal/issues/96 talks about both
the issue and its solution.
GCC 8's -Wcast-function-type, enabled by -Wextra, is problematic in glib
applications because it's idiomatic there to recast function signatures,
e.g. `g_slist_free(list, (GFunc)g_free, NULL);`.
Disabling the warning with pragmas causes "unrecognized pragma" warnings
on clang and older versions of gcc, and disabling the warning could miss
actual bugs. GCC defines `void (*)(void)` as a special case that matches
anything so we can silence warnings by double-casting through GCallback.
In the previous example, the warning is silenced by changing the code to
read `g_slist_free(list, (GFunc)(GCallback)g_free, NULL);`).
* fixup! fix "unused in lambda capture" warnings by clang++
* fixup! fix "unused in lambda capture" warnings by clang++
* fix two more libtransmission compiler warnings
* fix: in watchdir, use TR_ENABLE_ASSERTS not NDEBUG
Previously building with `cmake -G Ninja` would fail with this error:
ninja: error: 'third-party/event-c51b159cff/lib/libevent.a', needed by
'libtransmission/transmission-test-watchdir_generic', missing and no
known rule to make it
This was due to missing BUILD_BYPRODUCTS in the calls to
ExternalProject_Add(), as discussed here:
<https://cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2015-April/060234.html>
Standard Windows programs (e.g. Explorer) tolerate this, but some other
programs (e.g. Firefox) are more strict in how they retrieve version
information and may fail if language IDs in StringFileInfo and VarFileInfo
don't match.
It was announced on March 5th that CyaSSL changes name to WolfSSL,
and version 3.4.0 has been released under that new name. Tune
FindCyaSSL.cmake a bit to probe for both libraries. Fortunately,
compatibility headers are provided so I didn't have to touch the
code at all for now.
There're too many functions and types to consider, and benefits of not
using LFS macros aren't that big (I was thinking of using fts(3) but
that may not happen soon or at all).
Some crypto libraries (like CyaSSL, MatrixSSL and CommonCrypto) either
don't have or expose this functionality at all, expose only part of it,
or (like OpenSSL) have heavyweight API for it. Also, for the task as
easy as BASE64 encoding and decoding it's much better to use small and
simple specialized library.
Mike Gelfand