It wasn't clear that Google Cloud Storage and Google Drive are two different services and that one should use the rclone backend for the latter. This commit adds a note with this information.
After the `BlobSaver` job is submitted, the buffer can be released and
reused by another `FileSaver` even before `BlobSaver.Save` returns. That
FileSaver will the change `buf.Data` leading to wrong backup statistics.
Found by `go test -race ./...`:
WARNING: DATA RACE
Write at 0x00c0000784a0 by goroutine 41:
github.com/restic/restic/internal/archiver.(*FileSaver).saveFile()
/home/michael/Projekte/restic/restic/internal/archiver/file_saver.go:176 +0x789
github.com/restic/restic/internal/archiver.(*FileSaver).worker()
/home/michael/Projekte/restic/restic/internal/archiver/file_saver.go:242 +0x2af
github.com/restic/restic/internal/archiver.NewFileSaver.func2()
/home/michael/Projekte/restic/restic/internal/archiver/file_saver.go:88 +0x5d
golang.org/x/sync/errgroup.(*Group).Go.func1()
/home/michael/go/pkg/mod/golang.org/x/sync@v0.0.0-20210220032951-036812b2e83c/errgroup/errgroup.go:57 +0x91
Previous read at 0x00c0000784a0 by goroutine 29:
github.com/restic/restic/internal/archiver.(*BlobSaver).Save()
/home/michael/Projekte/restic/restic/internal/archiver/blob_saver.go:57 +0x1dd
github.com/restic/restic/internal/archiver.(*BlobSaver).Save-fm()
<autogenerated>:1 +0xac
github.com/restic/restic/internal/archiver.(*FileSaver).saveFile()
/home/michael/Projekte/restic/restic/internal/archiver/file_saver.go:191 +0x855
github.com/restic/restic/internal/archiver.(*FileSaver).worker()
/home/michael/Projekte/restic/restic/internal/archiver/file_saver.go:242 +0x2af
github.com/restic/restic/internal/archiver.NewFileSaver.func2()
/home/michael/Projekte/restic/restic/internal/archiver/file_saver.go:88 +0x5d
golang.org/x/sync/errgroup.(*Group).Go.func1()
/home/michael/go/pkg/mod/golang.org/x/sync@v0.0.0-20210220032951-036812b2e83c/errgroup/errgroup.go:57 +0x91
Use runtime.GOMAXPROCS(0) as worker count for CPU-bound tasks,
repo.Connections() for IO-bound task and a combination if a task can be
both. Streaming packs is treated as IO-bound as adding more worker
cannot provide a speedup.
Typical IO-bound tasks are download / uploading / deleting files.
Decoding / Encoding / Verifying are usually CPU-bound. Several tasks are
a combination of both, e.g. for combined download and decode functions.
In the latter case add both limits together. As the backends have their
own concurrency limits restic still won't download more than
repo.Connections() files in parallel, but the additional workers can
decode already downloaded data in parallel.
Use only a single not completed pack file to keep the number of open and
active pack files low. The main change here is to defer hashing the pack
file to the upload step. This prevents the pack assembly step to become
a bottleneck as the only task is now to write data to the temporary pack
file.
The tests are cleaned up to no longer reimplement packer manager
functions.
Now with the asynchronous uploaders there's no more benefit from using
more blob savers than we have CPUs. Thus use just one blob saver for
each CPU we are allowed to use.
Previously, SaveAndEncrypt would assemble blobs into packs and either
return immediately if the pack is not yet full or upload the pack file
otherwise. The upload will block the current goroutine until it
finishes.
Now, the upload is done using separate goroutines. This requires changes
to the error handling. As uploads are no longer tied to a SaveAndEncrypt
call, failed uploads are signaled using an errgroup.
To count the uploaded amount of data, the pack header overhead is no
longer returned by `packer.Finalize` but rather by
`packer.HeaderOverhead`. This helper method is necessary to continue
returning the pack header overhead directly to the responsible call to
`repository.SaveBlob`. Without the method this would not be possible,
as packs are finalized asynchronously.
The short ids are not always unique. In addition, recovering from
damages is easier when having the full ids as that makes it easier to
access the corresponding files.
raw-data summed up the size of the blob plaintexts. However, with
compression this makes little sense as the storage size in the
repository is lower due to compression. Thus sum up the actual size each
blob takes in the repository.
Michael Eischer